In a multivariate logistic regression for CLABSI risk, which insertion site shows a protective association?

Prepare for the APIC Infection Prevention and Control exam. Master key concepts with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready to excel!

Multiple Choice

In a multivariate logistic regression for CLABSI risk, which insertion site shows a protective association?

Explanation:
In this context, a protective association means that using a particular insertion site lowers the odds of developing CLABSI after accounting for other factors. The subclavian vein as the central venous catheter insertion site tends to show lower CLABSI odds compared with other sites when multivariate analysis controls for variables like catheter duration, patient comorbidities, and care setting. This reflects an association where the odds ratio is less than one, indicating reduced infection risk at that site. The other sites don’t show this protective pattern consistently in analyses; femoral access, for example, is often associated with higher infection risk due to the groin location, and internal jugular access can have higher or comparable risk depending on study and adjustments. The takeaway is that, in this analysis, the subclavian route is linked to lower infection odds, while the others do not.

In this context, a protective association means that using a particular insertion site lowers the odds of developing CLABSI after accounting for other factors. The subclavian vein as the central venous catheter insertion site tends to show lower CLABSI odds compared with other sites when multivariate analysis controls for variables like catheter duration, patient comorbidities, and care setting. This reflects an association where the odds ratio is less than one, indicating reduced infection risk at that site.

The other sites don’t show this protective pattern consistently in analyses; femoral access, for example, is often associated with higher infection risk due to the groin location, and internal jugular access can have higher or comparable risk depending on study and adjustments. The takeaway is that, in this analysis, the subclavian route is linked to lower infection odds, while the others do not.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy